TipzyTipzy
PronósticosRegistrosLigasMetodologíaGlosarioCasas de apuestasBlog
TipzyTipzy

Verificación independiente de tipsters. Liquidamos cada pronóstico publicado contra el resultado final y publicamos el registro.

Explorar

Registros de tipstersLigasMetodologíaEstudio de pronósticos gratuitosGlosario de apuestasCasas de apuestasBlog

Tipsters

Cómo te medimosSolicitar una corrección

Empresa

Sobre TipzyContactoJuego responsableTérminos del servicioPolítica de privacidad

+18 · Cumplimiento normativo

El juego está restringido a personas adultas y puede crear adicción. La edad mínima legal y las normas que se te aplican dependen de dónde vivas: consulta la legislación de tu jurisdicción antes de apostar. Juega con responsabilidad.

Gambling Therapy Gamblers Anonymous

© 2026 Tipzy. Todos los derechos reservados.

18+
HomeRecordsPicksBlog
  1. Home
  2. Tipster records
  3. CHFX33

CHFX33

Publishes on Oddspedia · first tracked 2026-08-11

Link it to a Tipzy account and let subscribers get your picks by email.

Tipzy Score

39

75 = break-even, proven

Tipzy is not affiliated with Oddspedia or with CHFX33, and is not paid by either. This record is built only from picks published publicly on Oddspedia and graded against the final result. How this is measured

Claimed vs measured

Claimed on Oddspedia

+98.4% ROI

over 83 tips

Measured by Tipzy

−22.4%

over 5 priced picks

These measure different sets over different periods — we track from the date above, not from the start of their history — so a gap is not by itself evidence of anything. It is shown so both numbers are visible at once.

Published prices

Unprovenn=5

Prices as published by the tipster — profit here is a return someone could have taken.

Settled

5

5 graded

Win rate

60.0%

Too few to bound

Profit

−1.1u

over 5u staked

Yield

−22.4%

By market

Ordered by sample size. Unmapped markets are shown rather than hidden — they are picks we recorded but have not yet normalised. Win rate is withheld below 10 settled picks. Click a market to see its picks.

MarketSettledWin rateProfit
Over/Under4—−0.1u
Both teams to score1—−1.0u

By league

Top 12 leagues by number of settled picks. Win rate is withheld below 10 settled picks. Click a league to see its picks.

LeagueSettledWin rateProfit
Premier League2—+0.6u
Premier League. Season 26/271—−1.0u
Primera Division. Season 26/27↗Primera Division. Season 26/27 league page1—−1.0u
Third qualifying rounds. Second Leg↗Third qualifying rounds. Second Leg league page1—+0.3u

Recent settled picks

Clear

Hull City vs Aston Villa

Premier League. Season 26/27

Lost

Over 1.75Total Goals

Tipster odds
1.34-29417/500.34-2.94+0.34
Feed close
—
Score
0-0

2026-09-05 · tipped 40h before

Universidad Catolica Quito vs Deportivo Aucas

Premier League

Won

Under 3.5Total Goals

Tipster odds
1.25-4001/40.25-4.00+0.25
Feed close
—
Score
1-1

2026-09-03 · tipped 2h before

Iberia 1999 vs Larne

Third qualifying rounds. Second Leg

Won

Under 3.25Total Goals

Tipster odds
1.28-3577/250.28-3.57+0.28
Feed close
—
Score
2-1

2026-08-11 · tipped 10h before

Marumo Gallants vs Kruger United

Premier League

Won

Under 2.5Total Goals

Tipster odds
1.35-2867/200.35-2.86+0.35
Feed close
—
Score
0-0

2026-08-11 · tipped 11h before

MatchPlayedSelectionTipster oddsFeed closeScoreResult
Hull City vs Aston VillaPremier League. Season 26/272026-09-05tipped 40h beforeOver 1.75Total Goals1.34-29417/500.34-2.94+0.34—0-0LOST
Universidad Catolica Quito vs Deportivo AucasPremier League2026-09-03tipped 2h beforeUnder 3.5Total Goals1.25-4001/40.25-4.00+0.25—1-1WON
Iberia 1999 vs LarneThird qualifying rounds. Second Leg2026-08-11tipped 10h beforeUnder 3.25Total Goals1.28-3577/250.28-3.57+0.28—2-1WON
Marumo Gallants vs Kruger UnitedPremier League2026-08-11tipped 11h beforeUnder 2.5Total Goals1.35-2867/200.35-2.86+0.35—0-0WON

1–4 of 4· 3 won / 1 lost · −0.1u · −3.0% yield · of 6 total

Think this record is wrong — a pick you did not publish, a wrong grade, a mis-matched fixture? Tell us and we will check it against what we captured and correct anything we got wrong.