When tipsters agree, does it pay?
Where several tracked tipsters backed the same market, here is how they split — and whether the pick most of them made actually landed.
- Crowds
- 1,346
- Tipsters
- 759
- Sources
- 13
- Corpus covered
- 54.4%
| Fixture | Selection | Tipsters | Stake | Diff | Tips |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vancouver Whitecaps vs LA GalaxyMatch winner · MLS10 Sept 2026landed | Home | 100.0% | — | — | 3 |
Who backed thisHome · 3
| |||||
| Los Angeles Dodgers vs Cincinnati RedsAsian handicap · MLB10 Sept 2026landedone source | Away | 100.0% | 100.0% | 0pp | 3 |
| Chicago Fire vs Inter MiamiDouble chance · MLS10 Sept 2026landed | Home or draw | 100.0% | — | — | 3 |
Who backed thisHome or draw · 3
| |||||
| Derby County vs West BromwichMatch winner · Championship9 Sept 2026landed | Away | 100.0% | 100.0% | 0pp | 3 |
Who backed thisAway · 3
| |||||
| Al Mokawloon vs Al Ahly CairoMatch winner · Premier League9 Sept 2026missed | Away | 100.0% | — | — | 3 |
Who backed thisAway · 3
| |||||
| Twente vs TelstarMatch winner · Premier League9 Sept 2026landed | Home | 100.0% | — | — | 3 |
Who backed thisHome · 3
| |||||
| Al-Kholood vs Al-Shabab RiyadhOver/Under · Premier League9 Sept 2026landedone source | Over | 100.0% | 100.0% | 0pp | 3 |
Who backed thisOver · 3
| |||||
| Daejeon Citizen vs AnyangMatch winner · Superleague9 Sept 2026landed | Home | 100.0% | 100.0% | 0pp | 3 |
Who backed thisHome · 3
| |||||
| Cuiaba vs Athletic Minas GeraisAsian handicap · Serie B8 Sept 2026missedone source | Home | 100.0% | 100.0% | 0pp | 3 |
Who backed thisHome · 3
| |||||
| Millwall vs NewcastleMatch winner · League Cup. Third round8 Sept 2026landed | Away | 100.0% | — | — | 3 |
Who backed thisAway · 3
| |||||
| Bolton Wanderers vs West HamMatch winner · Championship8 Sept 2026landed | Away | 100.0% | — | — | 3 |
Who backed thisAway · 3
| |||||
| Al-Ittihad Jeddah vs Al-FayhaOver/Under · Premier League8 Sept 2026missedone source | Over | 100.0% | 100.0% | 0pp | 3 |
| Smouha vs Ceramika CleopatraMatch winner · Premier League8 Sept 2026missed | Draw | 100.0% | 100.0% | 0pp | 3 |
Who backed thisDraw · 3
| |||||
| NEC Nijmegen vs ExcelsiorMatch winner · Premier League8 Sept 2026missed | Home | 100.0% | — | — | 3 |
Who backed thisHome · 3
| |||||
| Lille U19 vs Betis U19Asian handicap · U19. League phase8 Sept 2026missedone source | Away | 100.0% | 100.0% | 0pp | 3 |
Who backed thisAway · 3
| |||||
| Emelec vs MantaMatch winner · Premier League8 Sept 2026landed | Home | 100.0% | — | — | 3 |
Who backed thisHome · 3
| |||||
| Estoril vs AroucaOver/Under · Premier League7 Sept 2026missed | Over | 100.0% | 100.0% | 0pp | 3 |
Who backed thisOver · 3
| |||||
| Halifax Wanderers vs CavalryMatch winner · Premier League7 Sept 2026landed | Away | 100.0% | — | — | 3 |
Who backed thisAway · 3
| |||||
| Palermo vs SampdoriaMatch winner · Serie B7 Sept 2026landed | Home | 100.0% | — | — | 3 |
Who backed thisHome · 3
| |||||
| Cruzeiro vs Atletico ParanaenseMatch winner · Serie A6 Sept 2026missed | Draw | 100.0% | 100.0% | 0pp | 3 |
Who backed thisDraw · 3
| |||||
| Espanyol vs SevillaBoth teams to score · Primera Division. Season 26/276 Sept 2026landed | Yes | 100.0% | — | — | 3 |
Who backed thisYes · 3
| |||||
| Marseille vs Paris FCMatch winner · Ligue 1. Season 26/276 Sept 2026missed | Home | 100.0% | — | — | 3 |
Who backed thisHome · 3
| |||||
| Deportivo Garcilaso vs Atletico GrauMatch winner · Premier League6 Sept 2026landed | Home | 100.0% | 100.0% | 0pp | 3 |
Who backed thisHome · 3
| |||||
| Celje vs KoperMatch winner · Superleague6 Sept 2026missed | Home | 100.0% | 100.0% | 0pp | 3 |
Who backed thisHome · 3
| |||||
| Vitoria Guimaraes vs Casa PiaMatch winner · Premier League6 Sept 2026missed | Home | 100.0% | — | — | 3 |
Who backed thisHome · 3
| |||||
- Vancouver Whitecaps vs LA GalaxyMatch winner · MLS10 Sept 2026landed—3 tips
- Home
- tipsters100.0%
- stake—
Who backed this
Home · 3
- Vitibet Algorithmvitibet4,079 picks · 64.6% · -5.20%won
- Predictz Algorithmpredictz2,174 picks · 43.6% · -6.46%won
- SoloPredictsolopredict203 picks · 76.8% · +2.48%1.40won
- Los Angeles Dodgers vs Cincinnati RedsAsian handicap · MLB10 Sept 2026landedone source0pp3 tips
- Away
- tipsters100.0%
- stake100.0%
- Chicago Fire vs Inter MiamiDouble chance · MLS10 Sept 2026landed—3 tips
- Home or draw
- tipsters100.0%
- stake—
Who backed this
Home or draw · 3
- Vitibet Algorithmvitibet4,079 picks · 64.6% · -5.20%won
- SoloPredictsolopredict203 picks · 76.8% · +2.48%1.36won
- Bonjornooddspedianot enough tracked yet1.50won
- Derby County vs West BromwichMatch winner · Championship9 Sept 2026landed0pp3 tips
- Away
- tipsters100.0%
- stake100.0%
Who backed this
Away · 3
- Predictz Algorithmpredictz2,174 picks · 43.6% · -6.46%won
- ZuluBet Algorithmzulubet119 picks · 46.2% · -55.33%1.40won
- PippiBetblogabet97 picks · 43.3% · -8.49%1.89won
- Al Mokawloon vs Al Ahly CairoMatch winner · Premier League9 Sept 2026missed—3 tips
- Away
- tipsters100.0%
- stake—
Who backed this
Away · 3
- Vitibet Algorithmvitibet4,079 picks · 64.6% · -5.20%lost
- SoloPredictsolopredict203 picks · 76.8% · +2.48%1.39lost
- haalbakaroddspedianot enough tracked yet1.35lost
- Twente vs TelstarMatch winner · Premier League9 Sept 2026landed—3 tips
- Home
- tipsters100.0%
- stake—
Who backed this
Home · 3
- Vitibet Algorithmvitibet4,079 picks · 64.6% · -5.20%won
- Predictz Algorithmpredictz2,174 picks · 43.6% · -6.46%won
- Adibetadibet274 picks · 77.0%won
- Al-Kholood vs Al-Shabab RiyadhOver/Under · Premier League9 Sept 2026landedone source0pp3 tips
- Over
- tipsters100.0%
- stake100.0%
Who backed this
Over · 3
- Enszi Diamondblogabet132 picks · 54.5% · +5.99%1.80lost
- Andy Murrayblogabet91 picks · 67.0% · +37.84%2.81won
- ThugLifeTipsblogabetnot enough tracked yet1.71won
- Daejeon Citizen vs AnyangMatch winner · Superleague9 Sept 2026landed0pp3 tips
- Home
- tipsters100.0%
- stake100.0%
Who backed this
Home · 3
- Vitibet Algorithmvitibet4,079 picks · 64.6% · -5.20%won
- Predictz Algorithmpredictz2,174 picks · 43.6% · -6.46%won
- alex.g1982blogabet87 picks · 67.8% · +9.86%1.56won
- Cuiaba vs Athletic Minas GeraisAsian handicap · Serie B8 Sept 2026missedone source0pp3 tips
- Home
- tipsters100.0%
- stake100.0%
Who backed this
Home · 3
- cqc2003Nblogabet96 picks · 49.0% · -9.89%1.91lost
- Brasilblogabet38 picks · 55.3% · +6.12%1.93lost
- TipsterLennonblogabet34 picks · 70.6% · +41.65%2.10lost
- Millwall vs NewcastleMatch winner · League Cup. Third round8 Sept 2026landed—3 tips
- Away
- tipsters100.0%
- stake—
Who backed this
Away · 3
- Predictz Algorithmpredictz2,174 picks · 43.6% · -6.46%won
- MightyTipsmightytips244 picks · 54.1% · -6.07%1.51won
- ProSoccerprosoccer149 picks · 67.1% · +1.04%1.65won
- Bolton Wanderers vs West HamMatch winner · Championship8 Sept 2026landed—3 tips
- Away
- tipsters100.0%
- stake—
Who backed this
Away · 3
- Vitibet Algorithmvitibet4,079 picks · 64.6% · -5.20%won
- Predictz Algorithmpredictz2,174 picks · 43.6% · -6.46%won
- Brandon bikesoddspedianot enough tracked yet1.60won
- Al-Ittihad Jeddah vs Al-FayhaOver/Under · Premier League8 Sept 2026missedone source0pp3 tips
- Over
- tipsters100.0%
- stake100.0%
- Smouha vs Ceramika CleopatraMatch winner · Premier League8 Sept 2026missed0pp3 tips
- Draw
- tipsters100.0%
- stake100.0%
Who backed this
Draw · 3
- Predictz Algorithmpredictz2,174 picks · 43.6% · -6.46%lost
- Nasusblogabet46 picks · 39.1% · +18.13%2.78lost
- @Tzoneplugblogabetnot enough tracked yet2.75lost
- NEC Nijmegen vs ExcelsiorMatch winner · Premier League8 Sept 2026missed—3 tips
- Home
- tipsters100.0%
- stake—
Who backed this
Home · 3
- Vitibet Algorithmvitibet4,079 picks · 64.6% · -5.20%lost
- Predictz Algorithmpredictz2,174 picks · 43.6% · -6.46%lost
- MightyTipsmightytips244 picks · 54.1% · -6.07%1.63lost
- Lille U19 vs Betis U19Asian handicap · U19. League phase8 Sept 2026missedone source0pp3 tips
- Away
- tipsters100.0%
- stake100.0%
Who backed this
Away · 3
- Bronze Maison Clubblogabetnot enough tracked yet1.85lost
- Bronze Maison Clubblogabetnot enough tracked yet1.85lost
- toquerothebossblogabetnot enough tracked yet1.98void
- Emelec vs MantaMatch winner · Premier League8 Sept 2026landed—3 tips
- Home
- tipsters100.0%
- stake—
Who backed this
Home · 3
- Vitibet Algorithmvitibet4,079 picks · 64.6% · -5.20%won
- Predictz Algorithmpredictz2,174 picks · 43.6% · -6.46%won
- tventreoddspedianot enough tracked yet1.60won
- Estoril vs AroucaOver/Under · Premier League7 Sept 2026missed0pp3 tips
- Over
- tipsters100.0%
- stake100.0%
Who backed this
Over · 3
- SoloPredictsolopredict203 picks · 76.8% · +2.48%1.22lost
- Epimitheasblogabetnot enough tracked yet2.69lost
- Epimitheasblogabetnot enough tracked yet2.82lost
- Halifax Wanderers vs CavalryMatch winner · Premier League7 Sept 2026landed—3 tips
- Away
- tipsters100.0%
- stake—
Who backed this
Away · 3
- Vitibet Algorithmvitibet4,079 picks · 64.6% · -5.20%won
- Predictz Algorithmpredictz2,174 picks · 43.6% · -6.46%won
- Alex0oddspedianot enough tracked yet1.77won
- Palermo vs SampdoriaMatch winner · Serie B7 Sept 2026landed—3 tips
- Home
- tipsters100.0%
- stake—
Who backed this
Home · 3
- Vitibet Algorithmvitibet4,079 picks · 64.6% · -5.20%won
- Predictz Algorithmpredictz2,174 picks · 43.6% · -6.46%won
- Safon4xoddspedianot enough tracked yet1.76won
- Cruzeiro vs Atletico ParanaenseMatch winner · Serie A6 Sept 2026missed0pp3 tips
- Draw
- tipsters100.0%
- stake100.0%
Who backed this
Draw · 3
- Predictz Algorithmpredictz2,174 picks · 43.6% · -6.46%lost
- Sports Picks 23blogabet45 picks · 31.1% · +11.82%2.91lost
- Vinnyrichoddspedianot enough tracked yet3.50lost
- Espanyol vs SevillaBoth teams to score · Primera Division. Season 26/276 Sept 2026landed—3 tips
- Yes
- tipsters100.0%
- stake—
Who backed this
Yes · 3
- Mazuryoddspedianot enough tracked yet2.00won
- Tomasz Kowalewskizawodtypernot enough tracked yet1.88won
- XSlaidoddspedianot enough tracked yet1.85won
- Marseille vs Paris FCMatch winner · Ligue 1. Season 26/276 Sept 2026missed—3 tips
- Home
- tipsters100.0%
- stake—
Who backed this
Home · 3
- Vitibet Algorithmvitibet4,079 picks · 64.6% · -5.20%lost
- Predictz Algorithmpredictz2,174 picks · 43.6% · -6.46%lost
- MightyTipsmightytips244 picks · 54.1% · -6.07%1.94lost
- Deportivo Garcilaso vs Atletico GrauMatch winner · Premier League6 Sept 2026landed0pp3 tips
- Home
- tipsters100.0%
- stake100.0%
Who backed this
Home · 3
- Vitibet Algorithmvitibet4,079 picks · 64.6% · -5.20%won
- Predictz Algorithmpredictz2,174 picks · 43.6% · -6.46%won
- deusexbettingblogabet37 picks · 51.4% · -2.65%2.88lost
- Celje vs KoperMatch winner · Superleague6 Sept 2026missed0pp3 tips
- Home
- tipsters100.0%
- stake100.0%
Who backed this
Home · 3
- Predictz Algorithmpredictz2,174 picks · 43.6% · -6.46%lost
- Barbapapaoddspedianot enough tracked yet2.00lost
- Football Bombsblogabetnot enough tracked yet1.99lost
- Vitoria Guimaraes vs Casa PiaMatch winner · Premier League6 Sept 2026missed—3 tips
- Home
- tipsters100.0%
- stake—
Who backed this
Home · 3
- Vitibet Algorithmvitibet4,079 picks · 64.6% · -5.20%lost
- Predictz Algorithmpredictz2,174 picks · 43.6% · -6.46%lost
- PauloFelipeBfoddspedia38 picks · 31.6% · -44.37%1.50lost
How to read a row
Tipsters is how many backed the selection. Stake is how much of the published stake went there. When they disagree, a few tipsters are loading on something the rest only nodded at.
Diff is that gap for the most-backed selection, in percentage points, and is highlighted past 10pp. Negative means plenty of bodies but little conviction.
The stake column is blank where nobody published a stake — most sources are flat-stake, and repeating the tipster split there would invent a money signal out of an absence. Rows marked one source are tipsters on the same site, who can read each other; that is agreement, not independent confirmation.
Did the crowd's pick pay?
Every selection above, split into the one most tipsters backed and everything else.
- Most-backed yield
+16.92%
3,878 picks · avg price 2.00
- Rest yield
+2.83%
766 picks · avg price 2.67
- Most-backed win rate
55.9%
95% CI [54.3%, 57.5%]
3,878 graded
- Rest win rate
47.9%
95% CI [44.4%, 51.5%]
766 graded
The most-backed selection yields +16.9% over 3,878 priced picks; the rest of the field yields +2.8% over 766 priced picks. The gap between them is +14.1%, but its 95% interval spans -19.2% to +47.4% -- this sample cannot separate the two. That is a result, not a missing one. The most-backed selection is priced at a mean of 2.00, the rest at a mean of 2.67 -- sides priced this differently are expected to post different strike rates on their own, before either one has actually called anything better.
Across the whole corpus, every advertised pick yields +12.4% over 31,043 priced picks. The crowd's pick is 4.5 points ahead of that, but the interval on the difference spans -7.9% to +16.9% -- so it has not been shown to beat the corpus it was drawn from. A corpus whose whole 95% interval sits above zero (+9.1% to +15.8%) is describing what gets published and graded rather than an edge a bettor could have taken, so treat every absolute yield on this page as inflated and the gap between two of them as the number that means something.
Why yield, and not the win rate?
The side more tipsters back is usually the favourite, and favourites win more often at shorter prices. That is what a short price means, not evidence the crowd called it right — see the strike-rate/yield pair for the general case. Yield is the number that pays, so the verdict reads from it. Win rate stays visible because the gap between the two is itself the point.
Both are measured over advertised prices only. Some sources publish a probability rather than a price; a price derived from one carries no bookmaker margin and describes a bet nobody could have placed, so those tips are excluded from these four figures entirely.
What counts as a crowd, and whose crowd is it?
Two tips are the same fixture when they share an event, or name the same two teams on the same UTC day. A crowd needs three or more tips on the same market, and one selection has to beat every other individually — a tie has no winner to name.
"Most-backed" is a plurality, not a majority: on a three-way market a selection only has to beat each rival on its own. A split of 5 home / 4 draw / 3 away reads as 5 against 7. The other side is a mixture of whatever different bets those tipsters made, never one shared opposing view.
These groups are backed by 759 distinct tipsters across 13 distinct sources.
These figures speak for 54.4% of the settled corpus — 22,543 of 41,440 rows carry a fixture identity we can group on. The rest carry neither an event nor a verified kickoff, and are excluded rather than guessed at.
How many tips each fixture attracted
| Tips | Fixtures |
|---|---|
| 1 | 2,480 |
| 2 | 1,559 |
| 3 | 771 |
| 4 | 443 |
| 5 | 325 |
| 6 | 192 |
| 7 | 143 |
| 8 | 102 |
| 9 | 82 |
| 10 | 52 |
| 11 | 50 |
| 12 | 47 |
| 13 | 37 |
| 14 | 34 |
| 15 | 28 |
| 16 | 24 |
| 17 | 16 |
| 18 | 11 |
| 19 | 17 |
| 20 | 13 |
| 21 | 9 |
| 22 | 4 |
| 23 | 7 |
| 24 | 9 |
| 25 | 3 |
| 26 | 3 |
| 27 | 6 |
| 28 | 6 |
| 29 | 5 |
| 30 | 5 |
| 31 | 2 |
| 32 | 3 |
| 33 | 1 |
| 34 | 4 |
| 35 | 3 |
| 36 | 3 |
| 37 | 1 |
| 38 | 1 |
| 39 | 1 |
| 40 | 0 |
| 41 | 1 |
| 42 | 0 |
| 43 | 1 |
| 44 | 1 |
| 45 | 0 |
| 46 | 2 |
| 47 | 0 |
| 48 | 0 |
| 49 | 1 |
| 50 | 1 |
| 51 | 0 |
| 52 | 1 |
| 53 | 1 |
| 54 | 1 |
| 55 | 1 |
| 56 | 1 |
| 57 | 1 |
| 58 | 0 |
| 59 | 0 |
| 60 | 0 |
| 61 | 2 |
| 62 | 0 |
| 63 | 0 |
| 64 | 0 |
| 65 | 0 |
| 66 | 0 |
| 67 | 0 |
| 68 | 0 |
| 69 | 0 |
| 70 | 0 |
| 71 | 0 |
| 72 | 1 |
| 73 | 0 |
| 74 | 0 |
| 75 | 0 |
| 76 | 1 |
| 77 | 0 |
| 78+ | 1 |
Where it holds up
The same comparison, cut three ways. Each column is a yield: what the crowd's pick returned against what everything else returned.
By how many agreed
Does a bigger pile-on pay more than a slim majority?
| Tipsters agreeing | Crowds | Crowd's pick | The field |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3within noise | 663 | +19.31% | +0.49% |
| 4–5within noise | 426 | -7.23% | +18.26% |
| 6+within noise | 257 | +31.38% | +0.01% |
By market
Agreement on who wins and agreement on a total are not the same act.
| Market | Crowds | Crowd's pick | The field |
|---|---|---|---|
| Match winnerwithin noise | 640 | +11.85% | +9.28% |
| Over/Underwithin noise | 476 | +20.28% | -2.74% |
| Asian handicapwithin noise | 168 | +13.21% | +9.58% |
| Asian over underwithin noise | 23 | -9.92% | +33.83% |
| Double chancewithin noise | 15 | +49.39% | -32.25% |
| Handicapwithin noise | 10 | -9.97% | +384.19% |
| Otherwithin noise | 14 | -70.43% | — |
By where the crowd came from
Tipsters on separate sites agreeing is a different fact from one site agreeing with itself.
| Crowd | Crowds | Crowd's pick | The field |
|---|---|---|---|
| Across sources | 849 | +23.96% | -24.52% |
| Within one source | 497 | +9.28% | +51.63% |
Why the yields here can mislead
Read the Crowds column before the yields. These buckets hold very different numbers of crowds, and a striking figure over a handful of them is a small sample, not a finding about that market. A row marked within noise is one whose two yields cannot be told apart: the 95% interval on the difference between them still contains zero, so whatever gap the columns show is inside what ordinary variance produces on its own.
Bigger crowds also gather on bigger matches, and bigger matches carry shorter prices. A difference across the crowd-size buckets can be the prices talking rather than the crowd.
These three axes are around a dozen comparisons in total, each at 95% confidence. On that many, roughly one in twenty would clear the bar by chance alone even if nothing here were real, so a single separable row is weaker evidence than it looks. Two rows pointing in opposite directions on the same axis, as the crowd-composition split does, is the pattern that is hard to get by accident.
Method and limits
Why there are no upcoming fixtures here
Every crowd on this page has already played and been graded. A tip we observed on another site is never published before it settles: showing someone else's live pick would make this a substitute for the site we are checking rather than a check on it. That rule is in the methodology, and it is why there is no "tonight's consensus" board.
Which prices count
Advertised prices only. Some sources publish a probability instead of a price; deriving one from it (1/p) gives a number carrying no bookmaker margin, which flatters every return computed from it. Those tips still count towards who is in a crowd — an algorithm's tip is a real tip — but never towards a figure about money.
Why this page disagrees with the research study
This page reads the live corpus, so its figures move as tips settle. The corpus study closes its data at the start of each month so a number quoted from it is still there when someone checks. The two will report different figures for the same measurement, and neither is wrong. Cite the study; read this page.
- Computed
- 2026-09-11 19:41 UTC
- Cadence
- Every request, live
- Revisions
- None — the corpus only grows