TipzyTipzy
PicksRecordsLeaguesMethodologyBookmakersBlog
TipzyTipzy

Independent tipster verification. We settle every published pick against the final result and report the record.

Explore

Tipster recordsLeaguesMethodologyFree tips studyBookmakersBlog

Tipsters

How we measure youRequest a correction

Company

ContactTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy

18+ · Regulatory compliance

Gambling is restricted to adults and can be addictive. The minimum legal age and the rules that apply to you depend on where you live — check your local jurisdiction before betting. Please play responsibly.

Gambling Therapy Gamblers Anonymous

© 2026 Tipzy. All rights reserved.

18+
HomeRecordsPicksBlog
← All records

Jov1972

Publishes on Asianbookie · first tracked 2026-08-18

Link it to a Tipzy account and let subscribers get your picks by email.

Tipzy Score

43

75 = break-even, proven

Tipzy is not affiliated with Asianbookie or with Jov1972, and is not paid by either. This record is built only from picks published publicly on Asianbookie and graded against the final result. How this is measured

Published prices

Unprovenn=26

Prices as published by the tipster — profit here is a return someone could have taken.

Settled

32

26 graded · 6 void

Win rate

53.8%

95% CI 35%–71%

Profit

+4.1u

over 65u staked

Yield

+6.4%

Streaks and worst run

Every graded pick in time order. Losing runs are what following a record actually feels like — a profitable one can still lose ten in a row. Drawdown is the deepest fall of cumulative level-stake P/L, published prices only: derived prices cannot lose real units.

Longest win streak

3

Longest losing streak

3

Current streak

W2

consecutive wins

Max drawdown

−7.5u

from a +4.7u peak · bottomed 2026-08-18

Performance charts

Computed from published prices only, level stakes.

Cumulative P/L by pick (units)

all 26

Zoom with the buttons above, the scroll wheel or a pinch; drag the chart to pan. Ends inside the shaded band (±24.6u) — the range a bettor with no edge lands in 95% of the time, so this record is not yet distinguishable from chance.

P/L by month (units)

P/L by league (units)

Biggest samples first · groups under 3 graded picks are excluded.

By market

Ordered by sample size. Unmapped markets are shown rather than hidden — they are picks we recorded but have not yet normalised. Win rate is withheld below 10 settled picks. Click a market to see its picks.

MarketSettledWin rateProfit
Over/Under2155.0%+4.2u
Unmapped11—−0.1u

By league

Top 12 leagues by number of settled picks. Win rate is withheld below 10 settled picks. Click a league to see its picks.

LeagueSettledWin rateProfit
Unknown8—+0.1u
MLS↗MLS league page6—−0.3u
Qualifying stage. Final. First leg6—−0.5u
Premier League4—+9.7u
Primera Division. Season 26/27↗Primera Division. Season 26/27 league page3—−2.4u
Qualifying stage. Final. Second leg3—+2.6u
Segunda Division2—−5.0u

Recent settled picks

Tips typically appear 10h before kickoff — median over 20 picks with a captured kickoff.

Clear

Philadelphia Union vs Inter Miami

MLS

Pending

Inter Miami 0Asian Handicap

Tipster odds
1.98-10249/500.98-1.02+0.98
Feed close
—
Score
2-2

2026-08-19 · first seen 10h before

Philadelphia Union vs Inter Miami

MLS

Lost

Under 3.50Over/Under

Tipster odds
1.93-10893/1000.93-1.08+0.93
Feed close
—
Score
2-2

2026-08-19 · first seen 10h before

New York Red Bulls vs Nashville

MLS

Pending

Nashville -0.25Asian Handicap

Tipster odds
2.08+10827/251.08+1.08-0.93
Feed close
—
Score
0-1

2026-08-19 · first seen 10h before

New York Red Bulls vs Nashville

MLS

Won

Under 3Over/Under

Tipster odds
1.95-10519/200.95-1.05+0.95
Feed close
—
Score
0-1

2026-08-19 · first seen 10h before

Orlando City vs Chicago Fire

MLS

Lost

Over 3.50Over/Under

Tipster odds
1.98-10249/500.98-1.02+0.98
Feed close
—
Score
1-2

2026-08-19 · first seen 10h before

DC United vs New England Revolution

MLS

Won

Over 2.75Over/Under

Tipster odds
1.95-10519/200.95-1.05+0.95
Feed close
—
Score
0-3

2026-08-19 · first seen 10h before

Orlando City vs Chicago Fire

MLS

Pending

Chicago Fire -0.25Asian Handicap

Tipster odds
1.95-10519/200.95-1.05+0.95
Feed close
—
Score
1-2

2026-08-19 · first seen 10h before

Columbus Crew vs Montreal

MLS

Pending

Columbus Crew -0.75Asian Handicap

Tipster odds
1.88-11422/250.88-1.14+0.88
Feed close
—
Score
1-2

2026-08-19 · first seen 10h before

Chicago Fire vs Portland Timbers

MLS

Void

Portland Timbers +1Asian Handicap

Tipster odds
2.03+103103/1001.03+1.03-0.97
Feed close
—
Score
2:1

—

New York City vs Philadelphia Union

MLS

Void

Philadelphia Union 0Asian Handicap

Tipster odds
1.95-10519/200.95-1.05+0.95
Feed close
—
Score
2:3

—

MatchPlayedSelectionTipster oddsFeed closeScoreResult
Philadelphia Union vs Inter MiamiMLS2026-08-19first seen 10h beforeInter Miami 0Asian Handicap1.98-10249/500.98-1.02+0.98—2-2—
Philadelphia Union vs Inter MiamiMLS2026-08-19first seen 10h beforeUnder 3.50Over/Under1.93-10893/1000.93-1.08+0.93—2-2LOST
New York Red Bulls vs NashvilleMLS2026-08-19first seen 10h beforeNashville -0.25Asian Handicap2.08+10827/251.08+1.08-0.93—0-1—
New York Red Bulls vs NashvilleMLS2026-08-19first seen 10h beforeUnder 3Over/Under1.95-10519/200.95-1.05+0.95—0-1WON
Orlando City vs Chicago FireMLS2026-08-19first seen 10h beforeOver 3.50Over/Under1.98-10249/500.98-1.02+0.98—1-2LOST
DC United vs New England RevolutionMLS2026-08-19first seen 10h beforeOver 2.75Over/Under1.95-10519/200.95-1.05+0.95—0-3WON
Orlando City vs Chicago FireMLS2026-08-19first seen 10h beforeChicago Fire -0.25Asian Handicap1.95-10519/200.95-1.05+0.95—1-2—
Columbus Crew vs MontrealMLS2026-08-19first seen 10h beforeColumbus Crew -0.75Asian Handicap1.88-11422/250.88-1.14+0.88—1-2—
Chicago Fire vs Portland TimbersMLS—Portland Timbers +1Asian Handicap2.03+103103/1001.03+1.03-0.97—2:1VOID
New York City vs Philadelphia UnionMLS—Philadelphia Union 0Asian Handicap1.95-10519/200.95-1.05+0.95—2:3VOID

1–10 of 10· 2 won / 2 lost · −0.3u · −2.5% yield · of 39 total

Think this record is wrong — a pick you did not publish, a wrong grade, a mis-matched fixture? Tell us and we will check it against what we captured and correct anything we got wrong.